Reading multiple digital sources in classa systematic review of the literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5935/2218-0761.20240020Abstract
Digital literacy competence involves the development of the skills of navigating, evaluating and integrating information. Although intervention programs have been implemented for the development of these skills, evidence is scarce in Spanish-speaking countries. To learn about and analyze interventions implemented in Digital Reading, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted. Fifteen articles satisfied the defined eligibility criteria and were included in this study. In general, the results suggest that the interventions have a positive impact on digital reading skills; however, most of them have been developed in the USA and some parts of Europe, evidencing the need for research in Latin America.
Downloads
References
Alexander, Patricia A. y The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. 2012. Reading Into the Future: Competence for the 21st Century, en Educational Psychologist, 47(4): 259-280 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722511
Axelsson, Carl-Anton Werner; Mona Guath y Thomas Nygren. 2021. Learning How to Separate Fake from Real News: Scalable Digital Tutorials Promoting Students’ Civic Online Reasoning, en Future Internet, 13(3): 60 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13030060
Barzilai, Sarit y Ibtisam Ka’adan. 2017. Learning to integrate divergent information sources: the interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition, en Metacognition Learning, 12: 193-232 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9165-7
Barzilai, Sarit; Shiri Mor-Hagani, Asnat R. Zohar, Talia Shlomi-Elooz y Ruthy Ben-Yishai. 2020. Making sources visible: Promoting multiple document literacy with digital epistemic scaffolds, en Computers and Education, 157, 103980 [en línea]. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103980
Bråten, Ivar; Eva W. Brante y Helge I Strømsø. 2019. Teaching Sourcing in Upper Secondary School: A Comprehensive Sourcing Intervention With Follow-Up Data, en Reading Research Quarterly, 54(4) [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.253
Coiro, Julie; Carla Coscarelli, Cheryl Maykel y Elena Forzani. 2015. Investigating criteria that seventh graders use to evaluate the quality of online information, en Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 59: 287-297 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.448
Hämäläinen, Elina K.; Carita Kiili, Eija Räikkönen, Minna Lakkala, Liisa Ilomäki, Auli Toom y Miika Marttunen. 2023. Teaching sourcing during online inquiry–adolescents with the weakest skills benefited the mostn, en Instructional Science, 51: 135-163 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09597-2
Hoch, Mary L.; Ryan McCarty, Debra Gurvitz y Ivy Sitkoski. 2019. Five Key Principles: Guided Inquiry With Multimodal Text Sets, en The Reading Teacher, 72(6): 701-710 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1781
Kohnen, Angela M.; Gillian E. Mertens y Shelby M. Boehm. 2020. Can middle schoolers learn to read the web like experts? Possibilities and limits of a strategy-based intervention, en Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(2): 64-79 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2020-12-2-6
Kovac, Miha y Adriaan van der Weel (eds.). 2020. Lectura en papel vs. lectura en pantalla. en Centro Regional para el Fomento del Libro en América Latina y el Caribe, Cerlalc-Unesco.
Macedo-Rouet, Mônica; Ladislao Salmerón, Christine Ros, Ana Pérez, Marc Stadtler y Jean-François Rouet. 2020. Are frequent users of social network sites good information evaluators? An investigation of adolescents!" sourcing abilities, en Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43(1): 101-138 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2019.1690849
McGrew, Sarah. 2020. Learning to evaluate: An intervention in civic online reasoning, en Computers and Education, 145, 103711 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103711
McGrew, Sarah. y Virginia L. Byrne. 2021. Who Is behind this? Preparing high school students to evaluate online content, en Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53:4: 457-475 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1795956
McGrew, Sarah y Joel Breakstone. 2023. Civic Online Reasoning Across the Curriculum: Developing and Testing the Efficacy of Digital Literacy Lessons. AERA, en Open, 9 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231176451
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico, PISA. 2019. Results: What Students Know and Can Do, Volume I. Paris, Publishing, [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754- en [Cit.: OCDE Page, Matthew J.; Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M. Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue E. Brennan, Roger Chou… David Moher. 2021. Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas, en Revista española de cardiología, 74(9): 790-799 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016
Pérez, Ana; Anna Potocki, Marc Stadtler, Mônica Macedo-Rouet, Johanna Paul, Ladislao Salmerón y JeanFrançois Rouet. 2018. Fostering teenagers!"assessment of information reliability: Effects of a classroom intervention focused on critical source dimensions, en Learning and Instruction, 58: 53-6 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.006
Roelle, Julian y Kirsten Berthold. 2016. Effects of comparing contrasting cases and inventing on learning from subsequent instructional explanations, en Instructional Science, 44(2): 147-176 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9368-y
Salmerón, Ladislao y Pablo Delgado. 2019. Critical analysis of the effects of the digital technologies on reading and learning, en Culture and Education, 31(3): 465-480 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1630958
Salmerón, Ladislao; Mônica Macedo-Rouet y Jean-François Rouet. 2016. Multiple viewpoints increase students!"attention to source features in social question and answer forum messages, en Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67: 2404-2419 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23585
Salmerón, Ladislao; Helge I. Strømsø, Yvonne Kammerer, Marc Stadtler y Paul van den Broek. 2018. Comprehension processes in digital reading, en Mirit Barzillai, Jenny Thomson, Sascha Schroeder y Paul van den Broek (eds.), Learning to read in a digital world, Amsterdam, John Benjamins: 91-120.
Stadtler, Marc y Rainer Bromme. 2014. The content–Source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information, en David N. Rapp y Jason Braasch (eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences, Boston Review: 379-402.
Walsh-Moorman, Beth y Kristine E. Pytash. 2022. Guiding their Thinking: A Formative Study of Digital Source Evaluation,en Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 65(6): 469-479 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1225
Walton, Geoff; Alison Jane Pickard y Lara Dodd. 2018. Informational discernment, desinformation and pro-active scepticism, en Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(3): 296-309 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618769980
Wineburg, Sam; Joel Breakstone, Sarah McGrew, Mark Smith y Teresa Ortega. 2022. Lateral reading on the open Internet: A district-wide field study in high school government classes, en Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5): 893-909 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000740
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cuadernos de la ALFAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
